I’ve been procrastinating since April, but now finally getting back to working on my book, Gathering More Leaves. I’m up to the tenth and final part of the book, which will probably be about seven chapters. Originally, I was hoping to be completed by my 70th birthday next month, but that’s not likely to happen (although I am committed to working on this every day). How’s that for a non-answer? Here is the first chapter of part X:

By the end of the 90s, I had been doing genealogy for 20 years. During that time, I had focused on uncovering family narratives and ensuring the accuracy of my family tree information. Then, these DNA tests for consumers came out in the early 2000s and totally changed how we find relatives. Even though I knew a lot about genealogy, and these tests were everywhere, I just hadn’t tried them. I wasn’t doubting they worked, but I thought maybe I wouldn’t find anything new. Plus, I didn’t really understand how DNA testing for genealogy worked. But in 2019, I decided to finally get a test and see if it could actually help with my family research. I will explain later how waiting actually worked to my benefit.

In Part III, I recounted how I discovered the name of my great-great-grandmother, Cordelia “Della” Pickering, who tragically passed away soon after giving birth to my great-grandmother, Della Gaume DeBacker. This discovery came after requesting military records from the National Archives for my great-great-grandfather, Francis “Frank” Gaume. We already knew from census records that Della’s mother, Cordelia, was born in Pennsylvania. Subsequently, a cousin stumbled upon a significant find in a book at the LDS library in Salt Lake City. This book, a history of a county in Pennsylvania, detailed the family of Corbett Pickering, residents since the early 1800s. Within this family’s record, a daughter named Cordelia was listed, noted to have married a “Frank Gaum” and died in Michigan. This was the extent of our initial information. I’ve previously shared snippets of what I’ve uncovered about Cordelia Pickering’s family and how DNA played a crucial role in unraveling both her story and the mysteries of other ancestors.

Finding Della Pickering’s family history has been a wild ride, totally unexpected and spanning almost forty years of digging. Honestly, it opened up a whole new branch on my family tree I never even knew existed, and it’s been packed with way more interesting stuff than I thought possible.

For those of you who have followed along closely since page one and have read every page of this book, I apologize in advance for repeating information here but I do so with a purpose. In part X, I hope to show the evolution of going from an ancestor for whom I knew almost nothing to a pedigree that stretches back to Charlemagne, and a family history with deep connections to the early days of colonial America.

So, without further ado, I present to you “The Mystery of Della Pickering (sub-titled: “How a Little Bit Of DNA Can Take You a Long Way.”)

Over forty years ago, when I embarked on my journey to research my family history, there was one family branch about which I had very little information. All I knew was the scant knowledge my father had shared about his paternal grandmother. He could only recall her first name, Della, and he said her last name was Gaum, but he spelled it GUAM. Interestingly, this spelling mistake turned out to be significant in a way that he never knew. In addition, he mentioned her origin in Ohio, her French descent, and described her as a “French peasant woman,” based on what he had heard from his mother, a lace-curtained Irishwoman.

Following my father’s passing, I decided to delve deeper into the history of our ancestor, Della Gaume. My focus was on locating her in the 1870 and 1880 census records for Ohio. While perusing these records at the National Archives in Laguna Niguel, I stumbled upon Adeline Gome, born in 1867, the daughter of Louis Gome in Stark County, Ohio. In my enthusiasm, I mistakenly assumed that Adeline Gome was our Della Gaume.

Roughly a decade later, I published my findings on my website, and it was not long before my dad’s cousin, Rita, discovered my error. She reached out to point out the mistake, clarifying that our Della had been with her grandmother in Stark County, Ohio in 1870. The 1870 U.S. Census for Stark County, Ohio, listed Delah Gum, a two-year-old, residing with her grandmother, Eliza Gum; while the 1880 U.S. Census indicated Delly Gaum, aged twelve, living with her grandmother, Elise Gaum.

In light of this revelation, I contacted the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and requested military service records for my great-great-grandfather, which revealed that Della’s father, Frank Gaume had married her mother, Della Pickering, in Wisconsin, around November 1868. However, this date’s accuracy is uncertain, as it relies on the claim that Della passed away eight months after their wedding. Notably, an affidavit from March 26, 1915, signed by Frank Gaume, stated that he and his first wife were married in June 1868. This discrepancy was further complicated by affidavits from three other individuals, including Frank Gaume’s sister, Mrs. Mary Saunier from St. Marys, Kansas, all asserting that Della Pickering died in June 1868 and was buried at the “Catholic Cemetery at Louisville, Ohio.”

I am guessing that they were married in November 1867, and either they knew or learned soon after that Cordelia was pregnant with Della. Further speculation is that they went to Louisville Stark County Ohio in the winter and waited for Della to have the baby. Her first pregnancy may not have gone well and while they were en route back to Wisconsin, Cordelia died in Michigan. Although the affidavits said that she was buried in Louisville at St Louis Catholic Cemetery, the cemetery has no record of her burial, and, as such, we do not know where she is buried.

In these documents, the name Della Pickering remained consistent. However, three of these affidavits contradicted Frank Gaume’s claim that he married his first wife in June 1868 and that Della (Pickering) Gaume passed away on June 2, 1869. An affidavit from Joseph Blanchet, Frank’s brother-in-law from Holmes County, Ohio, in 1917, confirmed Della Pickering’s death in June 1868 and burial in Louisville, Ohio. Another affidavit by Mary Saunier, originally Mary Gaume of Louisville, Ohio, filed in St. Marys, Kansas the same year, concurred with Della Pickering’s demise in 1868 and her burial in the “Catholic Cemetery at Louisville, Ohio.” A third affidavit from 1917, signed by Katie Bakule, a childhood friend of Frank’s second wife, Justine Blanchet, and an Ohio resident, corroborated Della Pickering’s death in June 1868 and burial in the Catholic cemetery in Louisville.

The reason behind all this paperwork? The government agency responsible for Veterans Affairs was questioning Frank’s marriage to his second wife, due to their age differences and the absence of ample evidence that they were in fact married despite having seven children between them.

I also explored burial records from the public library of Stark County, revealing that my great-great-grandmother was not interred at St. Louis Cemetery, the only Roman Catholic cemetery in Louisville. In May 1868, Frank’s daughter, Della Gaume, was born in Canton, Stark County, Ohio. Delia Pickering’s death in Louisville, Ohio, was recorded as occurring one month later, on June 2, 1868, according to the service records. The census of 1900 and 1910 showed that Della (Gaume) DeBacker’s mother was born in Pennsylvania.

A decade later, Cousin Rita made an intriguing discovery. She found a book published in 1884, housed in the LDS library in Salt Lake City, titled “Centennial History of Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania” by Rhamanthus M. Stocker. According to this source, our ancestor, Della (Cordelia or Cordilla) Pickering, was the daughter of Corbett Pickering from Gibson, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. The book mentioned her marriage to a “Frank Guam” and her death in Michigan. (Note: the name is misspelled GUAM)

The information from the book was partially confirmed by census records. Corbet Pickering’s daughter appeared as “Cordelia,” aged 10, in the 1850 census for Gibson, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, and as an 18-year-old in the 1860 census.

For a long time, this was the extent of our knowledge. However, my skepticism persisted. I kept separate databases to trace Cordelia’s genealogy, this included a branch leading back to Charlemagne, and a branch that led to a man named John Pickering who settled in Salem Massachusetts in the 1630s. We’ll dig into the Charlemagne link in a later chapter. For now, we’re focusing on the Pickering family, their relationships, and the history of Salem to understand Cordelia’s background better.

Around 2020, when I received my DNA results from Ancestry.com, the first thing I did was turn to the ThruLines section to assess my connection to Della Pickering and her presumed father, Corbett. ThruLines, generated exclusively by Ancestry, link individuals through publicly available family trees, allowing data comparison as if it were in the same database. Notably, these connections depend on documented research. Although more DNA matches are likely to exist, they are partially hidden due to the absence of public linked trees.

Examining the ThruLines results for Corbett Pickering dispelled any remaining doubts. It showed close cousins, descendants of my great-grandmother, Della Gaume, and her mother, as well as individuals claiming descent from Corbett’s siblings. Beyond the 11 DNA matches listed under Cordelia Pickering, who we identified as Della Gaume’s mother, the report added 13 more DNA matches through her father, Corbett.

Going back one more generation to Della Gaume’s great-grandfather, the report unveiled ten 5th cousins, with our most recent common ancestor being my 4X great-grandfather, Jotham Pickering.

These DNA results were significant, as our sole connection to the Pickering family of Pennsylvania had initially relied on a single line of text in an obscure, locally-focused book from the late 19th century. Fortunately, today, the book is accessible and searchable through Google Books, while a couple of decades ago, accessing it required a visit to an out-of-state library.

Thanks to Google Books, I gained access to even more information about the Pickering family in Pennsylvania. As mentioned earlier, the Pickering family of Corbett Pickering had moved to Pennsylvania from Massachusetts. Jotham Pickering, a Revolutionary War veteran, was born in Mendon, Massachusetts, and his grandfather, Edward, hailed from Salem. This journey ultimately led me to Edward’s grandfather, John Pickering of Salem.

John Pickering (1615-1657) served as an instrumental figure in the nascent community of Salem, Massachusetts. Admitted as an inhabitant in 1636 due to his proficient carpentry, he is notably recognized for constructing the historic Pickering House circa 1650. This residence, continuously occupied by ten generations of the Pickering lineage until the 1920s, constitutes a significant element of his patrimony and represents the sustained occupation of his progeny in Salem.

It exemplifies early colonial architectural style and domestic existence, having endured the era of the Salem Witch Trials, and serves as a concrete connection to the town’s formative epoch. John Pickering’s contribution in establishing this homestead solidified his family’s ties to the territory and furnished a physical domicile that bore witness to and conserved generations of Pickering history, currently operating as a museum that continues to impart knowledge of Salem’s historical narrative to the public.

First Generation

In my quest to uncover the history of my immigrant ancestor, John Pickering, I came across two volumes via Google Books that shed more light on the Pickering’s, a family that occupied the same house in Salem, Massachusetts for ten consecutive generations until the 1920s. My ancestors were part of the first three generations before they moved to Mendon.

The first book I stumbled upon was titled “The Life of John Pickering.” Initially, my excitement waned when I realized it was about a later John Pickering. However, Mary Orne Pickering’s introduction to the book did offer valuable information about our immigrant ancestor, John Pickering. She recounted that among Salem’s early settlers was John Pickering, who was born in England, around 1615. It had been a family tradition that he hailed from Yorkshire, though there is no written evidence to confirm this claim.

The name Pickering had historical connections to England, particularly in the vicinity of Scarborough and Whitby. The earliest documented information about our English ancestry was found in Salem Town records. On February 7, 1636, the entry mentions John Pickering, carpenter, being granted “inhabitant status.” Two years later, the town fathers contracted him to build a meeting house.

The author noted, “Few facts connected with his private history remain,” but she did mention that John Pickering built the Pickering mansion in 1651. Remarkably, this house, which was still standing in 1887, remains a historical site in Salem today. However, it was sold in the 1920s and is currently owned by the Pickering Foundation. A park now encompasses the area, and the Pickering House, open to the public, remains a prominent feature within walking distance of Salem Witch Museum and the House of the Seven Gables.

The second book I discovered, titled “Pickering Genealogy,” delves deeper into the first three generations of the Pickering family in Salem, Massachusetts. The book begins with a disclaimer, stating that no connection between any family of Pickering’s in England and John Pickering of Salem has been established, as no dedicated effort has been made to establish such a connection. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence suggests that John Pickering probably hailed from Yorkshire, England.

The book contains sections on the Pickering coat of arms, both in England and America, along with information about other settlers with the Pickering name. While the book covers ten generations of Pickering’s, I focused on the first three generations relevant to my research.

John lived in Ipswich, Massachusetts, between 1634 and 1637 before moving to Salem, as documented in the Salem Town records. He was granted inhabitant status in Salem in early 1637.

While he was fined for fencing off land without authorization, it is still unclear if the fine was ever collected. He lived from the 1630s until the late 1650s, predating the Salem Witch trials by approximately 30 years.

John Pickering was awarded a contract to maintain a bridge, but complications arose, and he faced fines for defects in the bridge’s construction, along with the threat of having his belongings (a bull and a cow) seized if he didn’t comply.

Following this incident, an extract from the memoranda book of a descendant, Colonel Timothy Pickering, who was US Secretary of State under Washington & Adams, suggests that John Pickering contemplated abandoning the Massachusetts Bay Colony, moving to Connecticut to establish a plantation, but gave up on the idea after returning with frostbitten legs. This forced him to live as a cripple for the remainder of his life.

John Pickering’s house, partly built in 1651, was maintained by his descendants. The Pickering house, still standing today, became John Pickering’s home until his death around 1657.

The book notes the presence of chimney back plates, with one of them still in the dining room’s fireplace as of the 1890s. The Pickering House, at that time, was already 243 years old and continued to be owned by a branch of the Pickering family until the 1920s. Notably, this book emphasizes that John Pickering’s early death in 1657 at the age of approximately 40 was likely hastened by injuries sustained during his journey to Connecticut. His will was dated July 30, 1655.

John divided his estate between his two sons. The elder son, my ancestor, stayed in the main house, while the younger son and his mother, Elizabeth, who later remarried, moved to another part of the property. Elizabeth’s maiden name remains unknown, and there is no definitive date or location for their marriage. The Bible of their grandson, John Pickering, suggests a marriage date of 1636, likely occurring in America.

Only four children are documented: two sons, John and Jonathan, and two daughters, both named Elizabeth, who were baptized shortly before their deaths. As they were married for twenty years, it is likely that there were other children who did not survive.

In the second book it states, “We do not know whether John Pickering was a church member or not. And from the fact that we do not find that he took the Freeman’s Oath, nor did he ever hold public office, we infer that he was not.”

Some suggest that Elizabeth’s maiden name might have been Alderman, as John Alderman of Salem bequeathed her an item in his will in 1657. John Alderman had lived in Dorchester in 1634 and later moved to Salem, where he made bequests to Elizabeth’s sons, John, and Jonathan. This has led to speculation that John Alderman may have been Elizabeth’s father, potentially making her maiden name Elizabeth Alderman.

Second Generation

John Pickering, the eldest son of John and Elizabeth Pickering, was born and died in Salem. He was a farmer who resided there. In 1684, Lieutenant John Pickering and his wife were admitted to membership in the First Church of Salem, and he gained full communion on April 1, 1694. Through inheritance and purchase from other heirs, he acquired the family mansion, where he continued to live, and eventually passed it down to his son, also named John.

According to the “Annals of Salem” by Joseph B. Felt, the second John Pickering was well-known for his involvement in public affairs. His continuous services demonstrated his competence, enterprise, and public spirit. He lived during the Salem Witch trials from 1692 to 1693 and passed away the year following the trials’ conclusion. He served as a selectman for Salem town multiple times, held the position of constable in 1664, and was among those appointed to run the stage line between Salem and Lynn in 1669. He was also responsible for collecting subscription money in Salem for the support of Harvard College.

However, his prominence was most notable in military affairs. In 1675, he was appointed Ensign of the Salem militia and later received a higher rank as Lieutenant. He served in this capacity during the Indian War of 1675 and was present at the fight at Bloody Brook near Deerfield after the defeat of Captain Lathrop on September 18, 1675. Lieutenant Pickering, along with Perez Savage, led the troops and distinguished themselves for their skill and determination.

King Philip’s War, also known as Metacom’s War, was a conflict between Native Americans of present-day southern New England and English colonists and their Native American allies from 1675–1678. It is named after King Philip, the English name of Metacom, chief of the Wampanoag. The war was the deadliest war in the history of European colonization of America in proportion to the population.

The Battle of Bloody Brook occurred on September 18, 1675, near present-day South Deerfield, Massachusetts. A company of colonial militia from the Massachusetts Bay Colony, commanded by Captain Thomas Lathrop, was escorting a train of carts carrying grain from Deerfield to Hadley when they were ambushed by a large force of Native Americans. The militia were caught off guard and suffered heavy casualties. Nearly the entire company, numbering about 60 men, including Captain Lathrop, was killed. The site of the ambush became known as “Bloody Brook” due to the high number of casualties. This devastating loss shocked the colonists and escalated the war.

In 1664, Lieutenant Pickering was involved in a legal dispute with the owners of the “New Mill” on the South River due to his ownership of land adjacent to the river. The conflict revolved around the damming of the river, hindering access to Pickering’s land. The lawsuit concluded with a judgment in favor of the defendants. The Pickering brothers moved their ship building operations to a new and somewhat unfavorable location. This may have been “a piece of marsh at Forest River” he left to his son, Benjamin, the shipwright.

Lieutenant Pickering was a legatee under the will of John Alderman of Salem in 1657, just like his mother and his brother Jonathan. The bequest to him consisted of specific items, including a table, two stools, a cloak, cloth breeches, worst stockings, and 2 pounds of barley.

Although the exact day and month of his birth are unknown, the family Bible of his son, John II, records his birth year as 1637, which matches the age inscribed on his gravestone. He was buried in the 57th year of his age on May 5, 1694. His gravestone, along with those of others from his family, was initially located in what is now known as the Broad Street Burying Ground. Later, these gravestones and remains were relocated when the hill where they stood was excavated. This hill was previously known as Pickering Hill and was opposite the present Pickering estate. Their remains, along with their decaying headstones, were placed under a monument at a nearby park in Salem.

Lieutenant Pickering appears to have prospered and expanded his landholdings, leaving a substantial estate to his family. His will, dated May 3, 1694, named him as a “John senior of Salem.” He bequeathed land to his sons Benjamin and William, specifically granting Benjamin a piece of marsh at Forest River. His will also reveals that he owned at least one slave, a girl named Maria, who was left to his wife, Alice.

It is unknown what role the Pickering family played in the Salem Witch Trials of 1692-1693 but they were there at the time.

Regarding Alice Pickering, previously Alice Flint: the book states that the records of the First Church of Salem indicate that she was admitted to the church in 1684. It was later discovered that she had married Henry Bullock, Jr., of Salem as her first husband, with whom she had two children.

Furthermore, Alice Flint had been mentioned in court records for violating a law against excessive dress in 1652. Despite being presented in court for wearing a silk hood, she was excused due to her declared worth of £200. Some confusion arises about whether this Alice Flint was William Flint’s daughter, as she would have been quite young in 1652. It is more likely that she was confused with her mother, also named Alice Flint, who was the one with the substantial assets. William Flint, her husband, was considered a prosperous man. In 1661, he was about 58 years old and held various town offices, including overseer of fences, surveyor of the Southfield fences, perambulator of the Lynn line, and more. He died on April 2, 1673, and his estate was equitably divided among the heirs in 1695-96 after a delay due to disputes raised by his daughters.

Third Generation

My ancestor, Benjamin Pickering, belonged to the third generation and was the son of Lieutenant John Pickering. Some genealogies list his name as Benjamin William Pickering, which is unusual for two reasons. First, it’s remarkable because no one else in the family seems to have had a middle name, and it was not customary for Protestants of that time to give their children middle names. The Puritans, in particular, were known for their aversion to excess. Benjamin had a younger brother, William, who was very close to him.

Benjamin was born in Salem on January 15, 1665/66, and he passed away before November 6, 1718. He was a “mariner” by occupation and resided in Salem. According to the book, “It is probable that Benjamin Pickering was trained in the shipwright trade, but he was mainly engaged in maritime pursuits, working as a shipmaster, perhaps starting in 1702.”

On June 22 of that year, he conveyed land to his brother William. In this deed, he was referred to as “Yeoman Alias Shipwright.” In deeds from 1695 and 1696, he was called a “Mariner,” and in 1698, he was termed “Shipwright or Mariner.” In 1701, he entered into an agreement with his brother William to divide the property they inherited from their father. As per this agreement, he was to have the western part of the house with one of the ovens, half of the cellar, the eastern part of the Great barn, one-third of the north lean-to, and all the land to the westward. This document labeled him as a “yeoman or Shipwright.”

According to the book, it is evident that he took part in the Indian War as of July 24, 1676, when four pounds and ten shillings were credited to Benjamin Pickering for military service at the Brookfield garrison. I wonder if this is not a case of mistaken identity because in 1676 Benjamin would have been ten years old.

The book notes that “Benjamin Pickering has more descendants bearing the name Pickering than any of his brothers.” It lists his seven children, including my ancestor, Edward Pickering.

Jane Hobby was the wife of Benjamin Pickering, and their marriage took place on April 27, 1693. She is said to have originally come from Plymouth, England. She outlived her husband by 32 years.